Now

w/ Alex Wagner
and Peterson panel ?

The Monday links.
Not exactly.
To be inserted* here.

[PoliticsNation?  That's the ticket.  To spite or some sequitor(~)Joan Walsh!
LOL Rev. Al: Congressman Thune re-read.]
*Plan B for Obamacare?  2016!**

Let alone Hard~ball [!]

**6-9-15

The Cycle

Addressing the Record or Lack thereof ?
Laws bite, unfortunately they take more than one party. 

"Out of step with the best" poetry.*

* insert at best
C3-PO? / FOX ROMANTIC U.S.

Monday Morning...

Patrick Henrys? Or Cube8s ...?


(fp1)


[Monday  Night Foos-ball?] {lost links to be recovered}

Later

w/ Alex Wagner
Now: Meet the Press / Equal Incendiary?




NFRY:
Pax on /Economics 101
Contrary /Pax asides.
Divide to concur ?

Good Cop?

Rogue Cop? (1)

UN speech by Israeli PM.

(1)  NOW  a. Where's a cop when you need one?, b. The Choice, c., d. By Polar, e. Game On!, f. Side Tracks
[NOW update -> here.]
Re/Lated ?(2)  Heuristic Concurrence and / Breaking good.  ^|^

[Time Stamped 10/1/13 9:56 AM i.e. A.]

Pinnacle of our Perdicament

NOW(*), not exactly, ALL IN.

[S O S]
(statement)

The president may or may not get approval from congress in one form or another.  A limited strike is opposed by some for not being enough.  With a congress of such low popularity, and criticism for not doing enough, the president will still have a schtick, and we will still have the table.

(* need update)

[New World Order ? ]

Kobayashi Maru

The Thick Blue Line.*

USS Enterprise [!]

[This is about the complexities of progress, metaphor not parody{*}, and boldly going where it is needed to make it so. The "Thick Blue" reference is not to admire the latter's insert but contrast the Thin Red Line with the admonitions of irony in being policeman to the world, not to mention "no win" or re-boots of history.]

* N O W (FP1)
[FP Re-boot and more.]
[Syria Resolution]**
{*} The Final Insert
** update [It is my view that measured actions are within the President's post-9-11 powers.  Not that I agree with their evolution, but imagine the difficulty in devolving them.[**]  Also Maru translates as "circle", as well as being indicative of a "ship".  It is not so much about the no-win, but more about the course.]
[** 8-30-13 re:bolds and italics here.[?]] [SOS]

From 17A to 37B

I am not Obama.*



*Whoa{!} 5 minutes into NOW!
(Wax on, Wax off?)
{!}nor Snow Den (or anachronistic not quite sarcastic inserts)
 [KUOW 10 to 11- China / Congress / N T P - (i.e. update links \\ which may not be possible)

7-18-13 Re [???]  Earlier?  Later, Know?  [!] ;-)  ACA "In Sickness & in Health" (Clumsy Inserts need to be reviewed here.)

TMI

A subset of Moos Room.

Knot (FP1)

World War* Z? 
Sea Labels[!]
Enough Ferment[!]


This post was started before knowing Arron Sorkin[**] would be on NOW. 
Not to pun on TMZ, or mock or honor News Room, but TMI[!!!!], enough with acronyms and on to more careful conversation.

* replace insert today's NOW
(the subset is to research prior context of m-bedded Z's.)
There is a pun on a (BP) bowl of porridge, in The Z Word with apologies to a canine gender of middle in bull. (Ctrl F "bear" under "middle")

[**]= NOW links inserted 7-16-13
For Re-view. (FP2)

Loose Dots(or inconvenient facts)

NOW with Alex Wagner: Immigration Reform
Ryan Lizza: The perfect the enemy of the good?(to paraphrase bill comment)

Facts:  Remarkably high if not record deportation and border security spending results in zero net Mexican immigration.

Of course the economy ruins through it[!]

(FP1)

"Powered By Intel"

KNOT [!] *

* NOW?

[Bottom Line, the Heading is actually the name of the segment** on NOW then***.  The lede contains (b.s.)'s for what you will find if you scroll/click. Under the asterisked question you will find them sorted.]

**(other segments).
*** related links

(Another filter factor [?] )
[Not to mention Zimmerman who?  Smooth move to make who knows who he is, the punch-line.]

[ "marks" added ... much later ... ]

6-25-13:  In the meantime I ran into someone who was quite concerned with the likes of the current goings on, in particular certain markets happenings.  Not to be obtuse but it gave me a chance to till my fertilizer and other field theories.  

6-27-13 Another report from The Guardian (NSA email)  {L}&{l}4label?

BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger"

I have a dearly departed Android.**
More on that Tan Gent later***.
Lede Or Ship [!]
Or Iron Knee Chef!

[Kant]
Now that's the ticket!*  Not[!]

*no SNL, but somewhere a Huntsman/ 3rd or 4th partisan Share 'n Angle.
**no, not a turkey(a 3G)
***  Curb your Journalism: Re-4mat'N.
(Ctrl-F 'n b.s. )

[FYI: "Blogger" is a dashboard for blogspotR's]

[Can?]



[Convenient Al Gore Rythms(square-bracket-eds) and Rubrics Cubed.]
...
[OW, not my We Ge! But DB(a) just in my inbox.]

a= exception to the Dash Bored[!] (link inserted later)
i.e. exception to the OW as in not just in, but recently ran across.
(original intent was "as")

[ Here we go again ! ...
buh dump ump  ^ (...)
Form^^ is not function, function is not purpose and everything else is gravy toss !]


^  re: sort (Norman Goldman is no dump but known for his employment of sound effects, and fits in this rim shot of radio hosts.  At least locally he fits on the air between Thom Hartmann and Randi Rhodes.)
^^ and the links here might need Platonic adjustment.

Tragedy in Aurora

First reports of a theater shooting in Aurora Colorado.(Dark Knight Rising) 
Campaigns suspended.
Same here.
Ahhh... Heck! ?

[Not that I want to go there**, but have I been there before ?]*

* Bracketed links added post construction of sentence.  Last 4words excepted.
** followed * closely (later)

[Not Quite ?]

[7-23-12 The post here precedes this follow up of sorts, for your digestion: Specious and Spacious Species.]
[7-26-12:  update and effect (label)]

Not to Follow-Up...

...Or Down*
But that's the ticket.

While I did read the 2nd link, I have only glanced at the Sorkin critique and I am surprised at the criticism for the creator of Newsroom.  Not an HBO subscriber, I only saw the first episode OnDemand and was very impressed with the whole deal.  I don't know if I will have the same perspective of Alex Pereene if I could have seen the later episodes. Not that I was that impressed or critical of him to begin with. I thought he was fair and balanced, but not in the way it has come to be taken.  This actually this does follow from my not going that far and how some get** where they are.

My second line will be more fully digested later, and provide more fair and balanced context.

* actually it might follow(the only piece I have fully digested)
** BaneOr Side Show
*** anachronistic irony (I Ron Knee, Iron Knee of Bowles-Simpson/Balanced Solution)
[The Romney Tax problem is a sideshow so that they can say that Obama won't talk about the economy.  Republicans have been unprecedented obstuctionists so they can run against*** the economy, rather than the choice between more change and turning around to go back to what took us down.  Now that is a follow up.]

I wouldn't go that far.

On the verge of declaring that the CNBC motto should be Lean BackWords, (I did use the term Fauxword), it is interesting how the words(** )play out.
[AM OC "DNC Uses Dressage Horse to Hit Romney on Tax Returns." Hiding behind the skirt of the issues.  Jeb Bush continues the Lyin' Eyesin'.]
But how far should one go? Not* that I was starting from there.**

*the Jansing&Co links aren't there yet
** Oops maybe I was.
(Note anachronism of asterisks-adjusted.)

[Here is where it started and how far will it go? See AM above.]
[This post needs some serious footnoting***. Re: Labels.]

*** V-8?  [under RNP (viii) links are being sourced re: labels and oops, I have a heckuva lot under construction.]

[Post Roman numerals is The Cycle & "It Takes a Village", and understanding(Bane) more than exceptionalism. Mean while... speaking of Hoover. (para-phrasing meta-ramble)The former president on Fame & Power, a puppet in the headlights or swamp gas? Blast from the past, MED or Axis of Awesome, Reign on Parade of Rove 'n Nordquist.  Hal-C-on days?]

[Re:NorMan GoldMan Show (my)comment below, oops, maybe it is hyper-bully?  Speaking of shows, a technical glitch makes his first hour a veil able. (Featuring Third Party candidate and Morman on Romney. Speaking of dissin'genius.]

Who Let the Dogs Out?

Original reaction: Not to Second Guess.

This idea coalesced from a Melissa Harris-Perry(*) panel and a Jared Bernstein reaction.
What irritated me was the piling on upon Mitt Romney. The second guessing was how Jared Bernstein discusses the context he was taken out of. As the panel on MH-P continued after her weigh-in on words via Barack Obama the segment on Word Police had nothing to do with my change, but everything to do with it; change and context and victim hoods. Not to mention "quote(s) from Nerdlandia" creeping into the X-change. (The hazzards of live blogging.***) I had no clue in the "footnote" controversy.** Am I falling for the spin, that Raw Money is a victim? Or do I forget my own theory of Share 'n Angle? Not too mention differences of intents[!]
* to be updated
** to be related later[!]
*** the alternative would be more awkward[!]

7-9-12 A Hunch Revisited as Obama prepares* to speak on extending part of Bush tax cuts.
[Segue/break: the "Dogs" above are "aTax dogs"; my subtle skirt of the issue.]

Regarding the president's speech, here are my rough notes:  Jobs.. core mission... rebuilding economy...stalemate...choice two views.  Top down- wrong...typical middle class tax cuts $3600... repeat $3600 Obama midle class tax cuts... for sake of misinformation.  We tried, slowest job growth, falling income, rising deficits... we can't afford more.  [me: we 1/2 tried more or other way].  People are with him, cut small business taxes 18 times, for 97% of them.  We should agree to do what we agree on!  [poor 1%, 2% 3%]  One year extention for under $250K then we can debate the rest and act or wait till after the election.  You are the ones driving the economy.  Learn lessons of the past, build foundation for the future.

* speech here[Note that links for "A Hunch Revisited" were contemporary, not later insertions. Referencing democracy and choices of direction.]

[Andrea Mitchell follow-up here: "fiscal cliff"?** and tug of misinfo!  Deficit distraction or key?]

[Bingo was his dog!  NewsNation "big tent" not to mention simple math from idiots.  I'm sorry, but math is where the numbers lie.  It is math warfare.  But I digress. Well,* not exactly ! ** And pardon my pun but Swiss Romney Knife?]

** bit of a cycle/anachronism here*** regarding insertion of links & today's asterisks.(I may not have the right fiscal cliff clip but neither does the math add up for AM or RNC. Re:Bingo and math of the dog carrier or station waggin')

*** (rather here **) HW B? (SK re/v SE: 5:25 HW Harvy Weinstein)

[OW to Act?]
[Bingo too point OH! (see poor 1%, 2%, 3%: LR RL)]
(Anachronistically where does MB fit in here ? i.e. I can' remember where Luke Russert was nailed down.  But I think it was Martin Bashir who was asking about the 1, 2 or 3% and the previous sequence w/links does hit the nail on the understanding or aTAX jobs.)
[Hardball: David Corn to Smerconish "Sin of making sense". Then Bob's your uncle. It certainly rots at the head. MM Marshalling Message ?]

Smirking Gun[!]

OK, I won't overuse the term smoking gun, but when I heard Senator McCain's leak theory, I knew something was up.  "The only conceivable" reason that McCain knows the "motive for such damaging and compromising leaks" is that it is something he could conceive of doing.  The Issa cover-up committee is along the same track.  Worse than Watergate, less than WMD***.

September 11th occurred because the Bush administration had contempt for the Clinton administration and refused to carry on in the case against terrorism.  Fast and Furious is still under investigation, but it seems that the political case is of the opposite extreme.  The Obama administration not changing more from the previous administration.

I have a feeling that the Issa Committee investigation is actually an attempt to interfere with the Obama administration* of justice and foreign policy.  Or retribution for Watergate, Iran Contra and Plame combined, or Republican power** as usual.
 
* Ctrl F "obstructionism"
** now that is the ticket or subpoena(Thom Hartmann)

*** 6-22-12 Pre-Post-or-us?
(I was reticent to use 9/11, especially with the smoking[!] gun lede-in. While Representative Mica is really stretching things, two things are certain. September 11th or even a dead ATF agent are nothing to smirk about, and Representative Issa hides his smirk with a snear.)  
[Related posts:  Re:investigation, Re:dribble, Re-course, Re:turn(Ctrl F "sabotage" "pate")]
[GPS for MSNBC labels?]

[!] really sic, i.e. no typo, nor disrespect for the departed intended
[A caller to the Ed Schultz show noted a similar theme.  Republicans are more about obstruction politics than finding the facts.  They must have something to hide.  Obama's success and their incompetence.  But then there followed**2 on Thom Hartmann the PE/FDR/BS [!]]

[It is on !]
[A friend asked my opinion on the wikileaks deal. Well more specifically the personalities involved.  Bottomline, I don't feel that military personel should take it on themselve to leak top secret information without considering the consequences, nor should they have been distributed without the same considerations.  Unfortunately there may not be enough law on the books to prosecute the latter although there certainly is for the former.  Who do we have to blame for the laws on the books?  Congress.  Who do we have for not enough laws on the books?  Republicans.  Well, it is not the quantity but the quality.  But the answer is the same.  Talk is cheap, but actions*2 cost.]

*2 accidental link
[Weird link of the day.]
**2 with all due respect for B.S. it was the PE crack by FDR (Privileged Enterprise)
[Not so weird link of day.]
 

Reel Ledership

Unknown candidate more favorable than Obama.
Obama leading over known persons.

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding!
2000th post.
(Counting 90 in draft, that is.)
 
Unfortunately, the blog format has evolved, and needs getting used to.
In fact, it seemed to evolve mid-post, as I managed to get in a bottom link here, but cannot not locate that process going forward or even in edit format.  


THIS just as I had declared MISSION IMPOSSIBLE, I mean, ACCOMPLISHED[!]
And just as I had reached a pinnacle of a point, (That was redundant, or was it?) {one of the the new features}
the irony* of Mission Accomplished, let alone leadership. (David Sirota and the Star Chamber)

NOW with** ALEX WAGNER,
But earlier with Jansing & Co.
And earlier with Ed Schultz and Nancy Pelosi.

BUT HERE IS part of the Mission CON *** TEXT,
and UNDERSTANDING "Who-w-Aww!"

* nails it:"Battle Him of the Republic".
let "alone" "leadership"
** or rather not yet with Alex Wagner
(and before I forget, it is the "pretty please" hyperbola of Romney, and the childish cycle.)
*** see CON 5 minutes on.
[Note Labels and comments(2),'n  Odd need.]

[The Alex Wagner link HERE.]
[Speaking of Dawn Key Ody]
[Late Possible Link inserted, let alone Try Angle.]

[Final note in reverence to Christopher Hitchens, and reference to Bashir and Ratigan. (oops)]
[accidental tangent found error in "Final" link/search/pun]
Mean[!]while: Ratigan has a panel on "Straight Talk" where Mission Accomplished applies to the popularity of congress.  With Republicans in charge of the House and having record filibusters,(meaning a minority has the responsibility in the Senate), their schtick is gridlock, not progress or compromise, let alone all truism. These are my prose not the panel's or guest's, but it can certainly be said that for the Republican goal of making sure there is a one term president by passing the buck, it could be mission accomplished.  But that hits the nail on the head with my lede (and the source) of Reel Ledership[!]. 

9-13-13 Jansen and Co label corrected(added).